|
Home
Practice What You Preach
by Chuck Colson
How should Christians view politics? How do we
decide the issues and candidates to support in this already overheated
political year? The answer is not as simple as you may think.
At the National Prayer Breakfast in February, I
spent a pleasant session with a group of fellow Christians talking about
protecting the unborn, fighting religious persecution, eliminating
slavery in Africa, and defending marriage. No controversy
here.
But only hours later, I met an old friend, a
Christian activist, who asked me to sign a petition opposing President
Bush’s plan to give legal rights to illegal aliens. When I
declined, reminding him of the Bible’s commands to care for the
poor and persecuted and to welcome strangers in our midst, he was
annoyed and started giving me the familiar arguments. Then he tipped his
hand. “Besides, they’ll all vote
Democratic.”
The example of immigration is a tough call. Many
conservatives oppose “rewarding” aliens for breaking the
law, and fear they’ll take jobs away from American
citizens.
The conservative in me tends to agree. But then I
turn to Leviticus, where I find God’s
command to “love the sojourner . . .” And in Deuteronomy,
the Israelites are warned: “You shall not pervert the justice due
to the sojourner.” The writer of Hebrews reminds us to show
“hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained
angels unawares.” Clearly, we have a biblical mandate to care for
the marginalized—making prudent political judgments in doing so,
like screening and making case-by-case decisions.
I get in similar trouble when I advocate allowing
felons to vote. Many Christians object to this because they’re
afraid ex-cons will vote Democratic. I do not believe that is the case,
but even if I did, I know the Bible promises redemption and restoration.
I believe all ex-cons should be given back their rights after a time if
they show they are living a responsible life‹no matter whom they
vote for.
You and I in good faith may disagree on how we
should deal wisely with illegal immigration or voting rights for
ex-cons. And Christian politicians have to consider not only the
Scriptures but prudential concerns. There are many policy questions that
don’t raise clear biblical questions on which Christians must
exercise judgment.
But with some issues there is no
“wiggle” room. For instance, the Bible is clear about the
sanctity of human life. If a Christian lawmaker votes for abortion, he
should be called to account. Taking unborn life is a sin; one
can’t disregard this and still be faithful to Christ.
That’s why I was pleased when Raymond Burke,
the archbishop of St. Louis, announced that Catholic politicians who
support abortion rights will be denied Communion. As Catholic legal
scholars Robert George and Gerard Bradley note in National Review
Online, the bishop has the right “to order them to refrain from
receiving communion so long as they persist in what the Church teaches
are acts of profound injustice against their fellow human
beings.”
They’re right. The Kingdom of God must
always trump the kingdom of politics.
Evangelicals should learn a lesson from our
Catholic brothers. We seldom discipline members whose votes violate
biblical teaching. I know one prominent congressman who has for years
worn his faith on his sleeve and frequently speaks at large Christian
gatherings. But last year he voted against the ban on partial birth
abortion. Astonishing! Even more astonishing is he remains prominent in
evangelical circles.
All of us must search our consciences this year
and weigh each issue carefully against scriptural teachings. We
mustn’t settle for scorecards or knee-jerk reactions, as many have
in the past. Ask yourself how politicians meet God’s standards of
justice and righteousness, how they respect life and care for the
marginalized. And then decide who best reflects these convictions and
can best preserve order and restrain evil, the first tasks of government
ordained by God.
As for candidates who proclaim their Christianity
and then vote against clear biblical teachings, hold them accountable at
the polls—and at church. When the world looks at the Church, it
should be offended by the scandal of the Cross, not the scandal of
hypocrisy.
|